Pappous43
Παλαιό Μέλος
Well, very, very briefly, the existence of Byzantine music (just like Western music) in church is exactly for a spiritual purpose: to promote contrition of heart and bring us closer to the Lord.My personal preference, though, is to avoid extra-liturgical performances in general because it separates beauty from the spiritual context and becomes art for art's sake.
The byzantine music is based on the Ancient Greek Music, in turn based on natural acoustical intervals of real physical harmony also discovered by the famous mathematician Pythagoras (also known for his math. theorem).
To make my point clearer, I 'll digress for a moment.
Experts say that Greek music was even more developed than Architecture. Now, remember that the styles of Greek (Corinthian) columns are still used in modern buildings like in the USA United States, famous buildings include the U.S. Supreme Court Building, the U.S. Capitol, and the National Archives Building, all in Washington, D.C. In New York City, buildings with these columns include the New York Stock Exchange Building.
So, if Music was more developed than Architecture, then it must have been really good.
Ecclesiastical music in the first church was based mainly on the existent Greek Music, not all of it but the decent parts for the church.
Many holy men of the Church have composed hymn music, after fasting and praying. Examples are St. John of Damascus (+750), St.John Koukouzelis etc.
Having said that, I agree with you, there is a danger that extra-liturgical performance separates beauty from the spiritual context and becomes art.
On the other hand, genuine traditional ecclesiastical byzantine music has natural/physical/mathematical harmony) and spiritual foundations by saintly composers.
Last edited: